EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 9.77%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity of --.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $144.20, signalling downside risk potential of -19.8%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global has an analysts' consensus of $38.14 which suggests that it could grow by 23.4%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, which suggesting that the stock is 152.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.599%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dine Brands Global offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues of $195M. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is higher than Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Dine Brands Global's PE ratio is 5.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.81x versus 0.57x for Dine Brands Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 7.44%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $144.20, signalling downside risk potential of -19.8%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $198.14 which suggests that it could grow by 2.24%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, which suggesting that the stock is 152.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.638%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 22.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.81x versus 2.00x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -1.49%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $144.20, signalling downside risk potential of -19.8%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $113.13 which suggests that it could grow by 39.92%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, which suggesting that the stock is 152.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.106%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.5M. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.81x versus 3.63x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -3.22%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 1.86%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $144.20, signalling downside risk potential of -19.8%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $136.59 which suggests that it could grow by 13.81%. Given that Shake Shack has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Shake Shack is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, which suggesting that the stock is 152.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.994%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $316.9M. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is higher than Shake Shack's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.85x while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 706.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.81x versus 4.13x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.